Why Rhode Island's Politics Appear Corrupt and What It Means for the Future

Long-standing political corruption in Rhode Island is not a new phenomenon, but its persistence challenges the state's image and governance. One of the key factors is the Democratic stronghold on both chambers of the General Assembly since 1940. This has led to a situation where party line votes often override gubernatorial vetoes, and a Republican governor functions more as a figurehead.

As Lord Acton famously said, “Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”

The Dark Side of One-Party Rule

The long-term dominance of one party has had significant consequences on governance and ethical standards. Notable examples include the elected mayor who was previously a felon, arrested for attempting to injure a man by putting out a cigarette in his eye, and his subsequent involvement in city politics.

This figure also tried to influence the chief of police to avoid charges, but ultimately failed. This man eventually pushed the chief out of the police station and closed down a business he was involved in, all while serving as a part-time partner. Instances like these have shaken public trust in the political system and upheld a legacy of corruption.

A Small State, Tight Networks

The small size of Rhode Island plays a crucial role in fostering corruption. In such a tightly-knit community, influence and power can be exerted with minimal effort. It becomes easier to 'tip the scales' with only a few key individuals or groups, rather than a large number. Some argue that the state would benefit from being part of Massachusetts, suggesting that a larger jurisdiction could provide more robust oversight and transparency.

Historical Context and Lessons Learned

While Rhode Island’s political history with mafia ties has cast a dark shadow, it is important to recognize that the state has been working to address these issues. According to Mike Stanton's book Prince of Providence, much of the political landscape of the late 70s to the mid-2000s was marked by strong figures like Vincent “Buddy” Cianci, whose influence and behavior have been central to influencing the state’s political culture.

In recent years, Rhode Island has taken steps to distance itself from its history of corruption. Despite lingering ties with lower-level crime bosses, the focus has shifted towards more self-serving, profit-driven moves rather than outright theft. This reflects a growing recognition of the need for ethical governance and transparency.

Conclusion

Political corruption in Rhode Island is multifaceted, stemming from structural imbalances and historical precedents. While the state has made progress in addressing these issues, the challenges remain significant. As a citizen, understanding the dynamics of politics and supporting transparency are crucial for promoting a healthier and more ethical political environment.

Recommended Reading

For a deeper insight into Rhode Island’s political history and culture, consider reading Mike Stanton's Prince of Providence. This book provides a detailed look at life in politics from the late 70s to the mid-2000s, under the leadership of Vincent “Buddy” Cianci.

Additional Resources

Prince of Providence