Why Lex Luthor is More Likable Than Clark Kent in Smallville

Introduction

In the television series Smallville, many audience members find Lex Luthor to be more likable, and even more relatable, than Clark Kent. This article aims to explore the reasons behind this perception through a detailed character analysis and comparative evaluation of both characters. Lex Luthor, unlike Clark Kent, demonstrates a clear separation between himself and his father's ruthless business tactics, making him a more admirable and likable protagonist in the narrative.

Lex Luthor: A Character of Distinction

Lex's Contrast with His Father

Lex Luthor's likability is largely derived from his clear separation from his father, a character who is characterized by his ruthless and emotionless business practices. In one particularly poignant scene, Luthor's father attempts to shut down LuthorCorp, his family's company in Smallville. This decision not only betrays Luthor's trust but also disregards the potential harm to his employees and the economy of Smallville. This action underscores the stark difference between Lex and his father, highlighting Lex's empathetic and forward-thinking approach.

Empathy and Perspective-Taking

Lex Luthor's empathy and willingness to consider the perspectives of others further contribute to his likability. He is portrayed as someone who genuinely cares about the well-being of his employees and the community. This empathetic quality is especially evident in his decision-making processes, where he weighs the consequences of his actions carefully, often opting for solutions that benefit the greater good. Unlike Clark Kent, whose strength and abilities often overshadow his human vulnerabilities, Lex's actions are rooted in his personal values and moral compass.

Clark Kent: The Hero Whose Likability is Compromised

Clark Kent's Weaknesses and Vulnerability

Clark Kent, while a hero and the protagonist of the story, is often viewed as weak due to his vulnerability to Kryptonite. This plot device, while powerful and unique, ultimately limits the character's relatability. Kryptonite destroys his strength, making him defenseless against even mundane threats, which can come off as frustrating for the audience. This trope, however, is not consistently portrayed in a way that fully captures Clark's potential for growth and leadership. While his actions and choices are heroic, his inherent vulnerability can sometimes make the portrayal feel one-dimensional.

Finding Guidance and Growth

Throughout the series, Clark struggles with controlling and understanding his abilities, often making mistakes and lacking guidance. Unlike Lex, who has a clear vision and is driven by personal growth and the betterment of his community, Clark's journey is often marked by trial and error. He has no mentor or guide to turn to, and this absence can sometimes make him seem more of a character in development than a fully realized individual. This lack of a guiding figure can make it difficult for the audience to fully connect with his struggles and triumphs, further diminishing his likability in comparison to Lex.

Comparative Analysis: Lex Luthor and Clark Kent

Conclusion

In conclusion, Lex Luthor emerges as a more likable and relatable character due to his clear separation from his father, his empathetic nature, and his consistent moral compass. These qualities make him a more sought-after and admirable protagonist. On the other hand, while Clark Kent is a heroic and unique character, his inherent vulnerabilities and lack of guidance sometimes make him less relatable to the audience.

Both characters play crucial roles in the story of Smallville, but the narrative often gravitates towards Lex Luthor as the protagonist whose character arc and development are more compelling and nuanced. For those interested in character development and likability in television, Smallville offers a rich ground for analysis and reflection.