Understanding the Two Fullmetal Alchemist Anime Adaptations

The Fullmetal Alchemist (FMA) franchise, based on the manga by Hiromu Arakawa, has captured the imaginations of countless fans around the world. Central to the series' enduring appeal are its two prominent anime adaptations: Fullmetal Alchemist (2003) and Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood (2009), each with its own unique characteristics and audience.

Why Two Adaptations?

The existence of two Fullmetal Alchemist anime series is a reflection of the challenges in adapting ongoing source material. The first adaptation, Fullmetal Alchemist (2003), aired from 2003 to 2004 and was produced by Studio Bones. At the time of its creation, the manga was still ongoing, leading to significant divergence from the source material. The series diverged from the manga, introducing original characters and plotlines, resulting in a different conclusion and a distinct story arc.

In contrast, Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood (2009) was developed after the manga was completed. This adaptation allowed for a more faithful representation of the story, closely following the original storyline and capturing the depth and intricacies of Arakawa's narrative. Both adaptations have their unique merits and contribute to the rich tapestry of the FMA universe.

Personal Requests and the Decision Framework

While personal preferences often drive discussions about which adaptation is 'better,' it's important to consider the context of both adaptations. Hiromu Arakawa, the author of the manga, had a hand in both series and expressed satisfaction with their outcomes. Both adaptations maintained her voice and respected the story she intended to tell.

Fullmetal Alchemist (2003) was, in part, a product of Arakawa's personal requests. She provided the creators with a basic framework and unworked plot points, allowing them to explore unique storylines beyond the manga's content. The 2003 series had some extra arcs and a more character-driven story that delved into the psychological consequences of war, which Arakawa had painstakingly researched.

Comparison of the 2003 and Brotherhood Adaptations

Fullmetal Alchemist (2003)

Character Development: The 2003 series focuses more on character-driven storytelling, offering more time and development for key characters. Standouts include Nina Hughes, Trisha, and others. Alchemy: Alchemy works differently in this version, though without spoilers, it's fascinating to see how it evolves in comparison to Brotherhood. Genre Feels: The slower pace allows for a deeper exploration of themes, with a more grim and dark atmosphere, while balancing humor and moments of fun. Side Stories: The series includes side stories like the Warehouse Soldiers' goofing off, Roy Mustang's unexpected pregnancy, and the Flame vs Fullmetal fight. Ed as a Soldier: This adaptation delves into the consequences of Ed's role as a soldier, based on Arakawa's research into war. Ending: The ending, though slightly rushed, offers a bittersweet and memorable message.

Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood (2009)

Main Characters: Brotherhood features Ling, Olivia, and Armstrong as mainstays, alongside Major Barley and Madame Christmas. Big Plot: With a more detailed and dramatic plot covering multiple times and lands, Brotherhood offers a broader and more comprehensive story. Alchemy: Again, alchemy works differently here, with a fascinating comparison to the 2003 series, and the addition of alkahestry. Genre: Brotherhood is faster-paced, bombastic, and highly Shounen, with a romance arc that the 2003 series lacked. Stories: Brotherhood offers a deeper dive into locations beyond the national borders, including the ruins of Xerxes, Briggs Fortress, Xing, and other battlefronts. Ending: Brotherhood's ending is highly satisfying and wraps up the story nicely, with a thrilling and well-orchestrated finale.

Recommendations

To fully enjoy both adaptations, it's recommended to start with Fullmetal Alchemist (2003) and then explore other shows. From there, watching Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood (2009) will provide a more comprehensive understanding of both series. Alternatively, if you choose to watch one, both adaptations offer unique and valuable experiences that cater to different preferences and storytelling styles.

Ultimately, the choice between the two adaptations comes down to personal taste and the experience you seek from the Fullmetal Alchemist universe.