The Misconception of King Ramses II and the Journey of Human Evolution

Over the centuries, the identity of the mummy of King Ramses II has been subject to many speculations. One of the most notable claims is that the mummy is that of a Caucasian, despite it being a well-documented fact that King Ramses II was a Black African ruler. This article delves into the historical records, genetic studies, and scientific evidence that support the notion of human evolution from a common African ancestor.

King Ramses II: A Ruler with Historical Significance

Anen, a high-ranking official during the reign of King Ramses II, including serving as Guardian of the Palanquin and Second of the Four Prophets of Amun, was more than just a trusted advisor. His lineage was also notable, as he was the brother of Queen Tiye and a maternal relative to Akhenaten and Tutankhamun. These connections to royal bloodlines further solidify the historical importance of King Ramses II and his mummy.

Reevaluating the Claim of Caucasian Descent

The claim that King Ramses II was of Caucasian descent persists in some discourses. However, this notion is often not supported by factual evidence. In recent studies to identify the genetic makeup of King Tut, the findings unequivocally indicated that he was of African descent. Yet, there seems to be a concerted effort to suppress this information. The scrubbing of such studies from the internet and the removal of related media content indicates a possible hidden agenda behind such misconceptions.

Human Evolution and Genetic Evidence

The question of human evolution is deeply rooted in the study of genetic makeup, particularly focusing on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). Mitochondrial DNA is inherited solely through the maternal line and is less subject to recombination, making it a valuable tool for tracing the maternal lineage of different populations.

Scientists have explored the origins of all races by studying mtDNA. The maternal Eve, or Mitochondrial Eve, refers to a woman who lived in East Africa about 200,000 years ago, whose mitochondrial lineage spans all modern human populations. This means that all human beings today can trace their maternal lineage back to this single woman in East Africa.

The Great African Migration and Genetic Diversity

The theory of the Great African Migration suggests that early humans left Africa between 60,000 and 90,000 years ago, adapting to different environments and thus developing the diverse physical traits we see today. As these early humans moved to colder climates, they generally became paler, with lighter skin, hair, and eye colors. In warmer regions, the skin and eye colors remained darker, indicating a more recent adaptation to the environment.

Examples such as the Cheddar Man, the first Briton, who was a Black man with curly hair and blue eyes, illustrate how diverse early human populations could be. Similarly, the indigenous Aborigines of Australia can trace their genetic origins back to the Great African Migration, showing the rich genetic history of human populations.

Genetic mutations in hair, skin, and eye color have been observed in various populations, all stemming from adaptations to different environments. This further supports the notion that all modern humans are descendants of a common African ancestor.

Conclusion

The claim that King Ramses II and King Tut were of Caucasian descent is a misconception perpetuated by a lack of transparency and suppression of scientific evidence. Genetic studies and the study of mitochondrial DNA provide clear evidence of the African origins of these ancient rulers and all modern humans. Understanding and accepting our shared African ancestry is crucial for fostering a harmonious and scientifically grounded view of human evolution.